[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Xen domU vs. more than 652 MiB of RAM
From: |
Samuel Thibault |
Subject: |
Re: Xen domU vs. more than 652 MiB of RAM |
Date: |
Thu, 1 Oct 2009 17:46:18 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 |
Thomas Schwinge, le Thu 01 Oct 2009 17:24:55 +0200, a écrit :
> On Thu, Oct 01, 2009 at 05:23:21PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Thomas Schwinge, le Thu 01 Oct 2009 17:00:43 +0200, a écrit :
> > > > There's a bootstrap issue: Xen only provides 512KiB of spare bootstrap
> > > > memory, which is not so much to build a pagetable covering 100s of MiB.
> > >
> > > But why did it work until now?
> >
> > Because PAE makes page tables twice bigger.
>
> Again: this system was already using PAE.
Ah, and with PAE you managed to boot with more memory? How big is your
kernel? Actually, kernels without debugging symbols & such don't have
the issue because while 512KiB is a minimum, the granularity is 4MiB, of
which the kernel may or may not consume a lot. without debugging
symbols, the kernel typically only consumes 1 or 2 MiB, which leaves
plenty of room for the pagetable.
Samuel
- Xen domU vs. more than 652 MiB of RAM, Thomas Schwinge, 2009/10/01
- Re: Xen domU vs. more than 652 MiB of RAM, Samuel Thibault, 2009/10/01
- Re: Xen domU vs. more than 652 MiB of RAM, Thomas Schwinge, 2009/10/01
- Re: Xen domU vs. more than 652 MiB of RAM, Samuel Thibault, 2009/10/13
- Re: Xen domU vs. more than 652 MiB of RAM, Thomas Schwinge, 2009/10/14