[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: nsmux Documentation
From: |
Arne Babenhauserheide |
Subject: |
Re: nsmux Documentation |
Date: |
Fri, 2 Oct 2009 08:23:24 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.12.1 (Linux/2.6.30-hh2; KDE/4.3.1; x86_64; ; ) |
Am Donnerstag, 1. Oktober 2009 18:52:57 schrieb Sergiu Ivanov:
> Yes, this is the long-term goal, though I definitely won't advise you
> trying this out ATM -- one of the most important issues is security,
> about which nsmux does nothing but standard procedures, but it is
> possible that something more is required.
OK, thanks for your warning!
Best wishes,
Arne
PS: I think that to get people to do some more testing, a few easy to use
examples (and one complex and powerful example) would be efficient - especially
if they directly contain the shell commands to use (copy paste is always
easiest) - as soon as the LiveCD is up to date again it could also get quite a
few people to try the Hurd.
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Unpolitisch sein
heißt politisch sein,
ohne es zu merken.
- Arne (http://draketo.de)
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.