[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: clisp -- Flávio Cruz, GSoC 2008 (was: Writing translators in lisp -
From: |
Arne Babenhauserheide |
Subject: |
Re: clisp -- Flávio Cruz, GSoC 2008 (was: Writing translators in lisp - cl-hurd code recovered) |
Date: |
Tue, 6 Oct 2009 20:18:02 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.12.1 (Linux/2.6.30-hh2; KDE/4.3.1; x86_64; ; ) |
Am Dienstag, 6. Oktober 2009 11:08:24 schrieb Thomas Schwinge:
> In the longer term, do we intend to keep all these repositories in sync
> (Savannah, gitorious: Git; bitbucket: hg), or do we retire all but one of
> them? Pros / cons?
I would definitely retire gitorious (since it doesn't add anything new - I only
used it, because it was the fastest way to get the git repo online).
Also I'd retire the bitbucket repo, if Flavio won't be working on it. Since we
have hg-git, keeping two repositories in sync is just unnecessary overhead.
For hg users I can add a line or so to point them to hg-git, so they can
access the Savannah git sources with the system they prefer.
Best wishes,
Arne
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.