[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Xen domU vs. more than 652 MiB of RAM
From: |
Samuel Thibault |
Subject: |
Re: Xen domU vs. more than 652 MiB of RAM |
Date: |
Wed, 14 Oct 2009 02:46:52 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 |
Hello,
At last I've merged all my gnumach trees with the git repos, ending up
with pushing a bunch of fixes, notably a correct version of my patch to
support Xen domU with more than ~600MiB. I know that at least bach and
mozart are currently running with 700MiB thanks to it. Could you give
it a try?
Samuel
- Xen domU vs. more than 652 MiB of RAM, Thomas Schwinge, 2009/10/01
- Re: Xen domU vs. more than 652 MiB of RAM, Samuel Thibault, 2009/10/01
- Re: Xen domU vs. more than 652 MiB of RAM, Thomas Schwinge, 2009/10/01
- Re: Xen domU vs. more than 652 MiB of RAM, Samuel Thibault, 2009/10/01
- Re: Xen domU vs. more than 652 MiB of RAM, Thomas Schwinge, 2009/10/01
- Re: Xen domU vs. more than 652 MiB of RAM, Samuel Thibault, 2009/10/01
- Re: Xen domU vs. more than 652 MiB of RAM, Thomas Schwinge, 2009/10/01
- Re: Xen domU vs. more than 652 MiB of RAM, Samuel Thibault, 2009/10/01
- Re: Xen domU vs. more than 652 MiB of RAM, Samuel Thibault, 2009/10/01
- Re: Xen domU vs. more than 652 MiB of RAM, Thomas Schwinge, 2009/10/01
- Re: Xen domU vs. more than 652 MiB of RAM,
Samuel Thibault <=
- Re: Xen domU vs. more than 652 MiB of RAM, Thomas Schwinge, 2009/10/14