[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Xen domU vs. more than 652 MiB of RAM
From: |
Thomas Schwinge |
Subject: |
Re: Xen domU vs. more than 652 MiB of RAM |
Date: |
Wed, 14 Oct 2009 10:20:03 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.11 |
Hello!
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 02:46:52AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> At last I've merged all my gnumach trees with the git repos, ending up
> with pushing a bunch of fixes, notably a correct version of my patch to
> support Xen domU with more than ~600MiB. I know that at least bach and
> mozart are currently running with 700MiB thanks to it. Could you give
> it a try?
Confirming that it works with 749 MiB, thank you!
Regards,
Thomas
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Re: Xen domU vs. more than 652 MiB of RAM, (continued)
- Re: Xen domU vs. more than 652 MiB of RAM, Samuel Thibault, 2009/10/01
- Re: Xen domU vs. more than 652 MiB of RAM, Thomas Schwinge, 2009/10/01
- Re: Xen domU vs. more than 652 MiB of RAM, Samuel Thibault, 2009/10/01
- Re: Xen domU vs. more than 652 MiB of RAM, Thomas Schwinge, 2009/10/01
- Re: Xen domU vs. more than 652 MiB of RAM, Samuel Thibault, 2009/10/01
- Re: Xen domU vs. more than 652 MiB of RAM, Thomas Schwinge, 2009/10/01
- Re: Xen domU vs. more than 652 MiB of RAM, Samuel Thibault, 2009/10/01
- Re: Xen domU vs. more than 652 MiB of RAM, Samuel Thibault, 2009/10/01
- Re: Xen domU vs. more than 652 MiB of RAM, Thomas Schwinge, 2009/10/01
- Re: Xen domU vs. more than 652 MiB of RAM, Samuel Thibault, 2009/10/13
- Re: Xen domU vs. more than 652 MiB of RAM,
Thomas Schwinge <=