[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Personal branches in incubator.git
From: |
Sergiu Ivanov |
Subject: |
Re: Personal branches in incubator.git |
Date: |
Wed, 14 Oct 2009 17:22:19 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
Hello,
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 03:12:06PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 01:49:13PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > I was told that personal branches (like scolobb/fix-something) in the
> > unionfs.git repository are okay for publishing intermediate
> > (unrevised) changes. Are they still acceptable for incubator.git,
> > where there may possibly be several contributors?
>
> Sure!
Great :-)
> > If so, should there
> > be a special branch naming convention for all contributors to follow?
>
> I'd say we can simply see how this evolves over time. Now, that doesn't
> help you too much when just beginning to work on the branches in there,
> so to make a useful suggestion: what about, e.g., using (a)
> nsmux/scolobb-WHATEVER, or (b) scolobb/nsmux-WHATEVER, or (c)
> nsmux-scolobb-WHATEVER (as suggested on
> <http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/rules/source_repositories.html>). I
> don't really care, so just pick one.
I think I'll stick with scolobb/nsmux-WHATEVER for now; the choice is
due to some vague sympathy, with no special logic behind.
> If you need some help which one to pick ;-):
>
> $ echo "main(){printf(\"%c\n\",getpid()%3+'a');}" | gcc -w -x c - &&
> ./a.out
LOL! :-D
Regards,
scolobb