[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Mercurial vs. git
From: |
olafBuddenhagen |
Subject: |
Re: Mercurial vs. git |
Date: |
Sat, 24 Oct 2009 06:08:49 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) |
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 01:55:41PM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> But to know enough about Mercurial for 95% of the use cases you need
> far less time than for git. A few quotes I collected to back that up:
Depends on how you count. Of course you can manage to live somehow
knowing only part of the features of the VCS; and I'm willing to believe
that getting to this point is indeed somewhat easier with Mercurial.
However, to use the system *efficiently*, you have to fully understand
it -- and I very much doubt Git makes that harder than other systems. (I
tend to believe the opposite, but then I can't really compare...)
-antrik-
- Re: Mercurial vs. git,
olafBuddenhagen <=