[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Mercurial vs. git
From: |
Arne Babenhauserheide |
Subject: |
Re: Mercurial vs. git |
Date: |
Wed, 28 Oct 2009 20:03:39 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.12.2 (Linux/2.6.30-gentoo-r5; KDE/4.3.2; x86_64; ; ) |
Am Sonntag, 25. Oktober 2009 11:08:47 schrieb olafBuddenhagen@gmx.net:
> Yes, it takes more then a few hours: reading enough of the Git
> documentation in order to truly understand the concepts, probably
> requires a couple of days.
>
> But for people programming 200 days a year, this investment will soon be
> made up for by increased productivity.
If it offers increased productivity over an easier to learn system like
Mercurial, that is.
To truly understand Mercurials concepts you don't need long - and you can also
quickly understand how to map these concepts to commands.
Best wishes,
Arne
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Ein Mann wird auf der Straße mit einem Messer bedroht.
Zwei Polizisten sind sofort da und halten ein Transparent davor.
"Illegale Szene. Niemand darf das sehen."
Der Mann wird ausgeraubt, erstochen und verblutet,
denn die Polizisten haben beide Hände voll zu tun.
Willkommen in Deutschland. Zensur ist schön.
(http://draketo.de)
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.