[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: OT: automation
From: |
Sergiu Ivanov |
Subject: |
Re: OT: automation |
Date: |
Thu, 29 Oct 2009 09:46:07 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
Hello,
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 08:34:50AM +0100, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 28. Oktober 2009 20:31:46 schrieb Sergiu Ivanov:
> > > mmv?
> >
> > I'd rather agree with antrik here, because stuffing all these
> > operations in a single command seems a little bit useless, IMHO.
>
> That's something where I also agree, though.
>
> The scripts I mean are these small utilities which can do what I need - and
> exactly that.
Personally, I think that such scripts are a very good thing -- one
example I can immediately remember is the well-known word combination
``backup script'': often doing backup by hand is too tedious and
time-consuming to leave this unautomated.
> > > Note: Until today I haggled with sed instead, because I didn't think this
> > > would be that easy with python...
> >
> > Hm, this may be case-specific :-) For me the sed command is much
> > easier :-)
>
> I think it might be "Python feels like home for me"-specific ;)
Ah :-)
> Also when I use sed I often end up with
> "command unterminated" -> damn, I forgot to escape something :(
>
> Might be related to having many spaces and non-letter characters in
> filenames, since the OS and tools damn well should not restrict how
> I name my files :)
That's also related to the MAX_PATH issue :-)
(I used to put spaces in filenames once, but then dropped that
practice, using dashes instead of spaces :-) )
> > I do agree with you :-)
> >
> > Actually, I believe antrik referred to professional programmers, too.
> > But I may be wrong, of course.
>
> Then I hope he doesn't talk about the Eclipse users - who make up a
> not neglectable share of coders today (it's too far from my shell
> for my taste... I decided to mostly use Emacs, and though Eclipse
> looks nicer, I only really miss easy refactoring - which I'm sure
> emacs can do, too, I just don't yet know how).
>
> I assume he talks about efficient UNIX programmers.
I guess we should wait for antrik to decide who he referred to :-)
Regards,
scolobb