[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: dash, PATH
From: |
olafBuddenhagen |
Subject: |
Re: dash, PATH |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Nov 2009 19:11:29 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) |
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 08, 2009 at 03:09:27AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Jakub Daniel, le Wed 04 Nov 2009 18:42:13 +0100, a écrit :
> > Unlike previous time I had to set /etc/fstab entirely by myself (all
> > lines were commented out and the content didn't reflect the real
> > partions).
>
> Odd, but shouldn't hurt, as passive translators replace /etc/fstab.
It's still necessary for fsck -a; and I think also for swapon -a?
I believe I could also come up with some obscure use cases where it
would still be useful to use fstab for mounting -- but I don't think
these really matter in the real world :-)
-antrik-
- dash, PATH, Jakub Daniel, 2009/11/04
- Re: dash, PATH, Samuel Thibault, 2009/11/07
- Re: dash, PATH, Jakub Daniel, 2009/11/08
- Re: dash, PATH,
olafBuddenhagen <=
- Drivers (was: dash, PATH), olafBuddenhagen, 2009/11/08