[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: benchmarking of user-level pcnet32 driver
From: |
Da Zheng |
Subject: |
Re: benchmarking of user-level pcnet32 driver |
Date: |
Sat, 14 Nov 2009 01:00:13 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Macintosh/20090812) |
Thomas Schwinge wrote:
>
> For modifications on the existing Hurd or GNU Mach code base, just create
> a working branch for each of them. We had enough discussions over the
> last weeks with suggestions about how to name and handle such branches,
> so that I don't really care anymore how you're going to name them.
> (<http://www.bddebian.com:8888/~hurd-web/rules/source_repositories/>
> still has my suggestions on this topic.)
I'll name my own gnumach branch master-user_level_drivers then.
>
> For new packages (like the user-level driver itself, I suppose), I
> suggest to create a suitably-named branch in the incubator repository,
> <http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/hurd/incubator.git/> -- how 'bout using
> user-level_pcnet32 for the branch's name?
Yes, I will use this name.
Zheng Da
- benchmarking of user-level pcnet32 driver, Da Zheng, 2009/11/12
- Re: benchmarking of user-level pcnet32 driver, Arne Babenhauserheide, 2009/11/13
- Re: benchmarking of user-level pcnet32 driver, Da Zheng, 2009/11/13
- Re: benchmarking of user-level pcnet32 driver, Samuel Thibault, 2009/11/13
- Re: benchmarking of user-level pcnet32 driver, Da Zheng, 2009/11/13
- Re: benchmarking of user-level pcnet32 driver, Thomas Schwinge, 2009/11/13
- Re: benchmarking of user-level pcnet32 driver,
Da Zheng <=
- Re: benchmarking of user-level pcnet32 driver, Da Zheng, 2009/11/13
- Re: benchmarking of user-level pcnet32 driver, Thomas Schwinge, 2009/11/14
- Re: benchmarking of user-level pcnet32 driver, Da Zheng, 2009/11/14
- Re: benchmarking of user-level pcnet32 driver, olafBuddenhagen, 2009/11/14