[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: OT: automation
From: |
Arne Babenhauserheide |
Subject: |
Re: OT: automation |
Date: |
Sun, 15 Nov 2009 10:51:29 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.12.3 (Linux/2.6.30-gentoo-r5; KDE/4.3.3; x86_64; ; ) |
Hi,
Am Samstag, 14. November 2009 23:38:21 schrieb olafBuddenhagen@gmx.net:
> That's where the Hurd comes in: with the extensible VFS, it's possible
> for every component to offer a filesystem interface that can be used
> by other components, by external scripts, or even by users directly.
> That's a much more transparent, convenient, and universal interface --
> and thus offers an approach to modularity that actually could work for a
> change :-)
How about a server which exposes dbus interfaces via the filesystem to give
instant benefit for dbus-enabled programs?
Would that be doable?
Best wishes,
Arne
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
- Hurdish Desktop (was: OT: automation), (continued)
Re: OT: automation, olafBuddenhagen, 2009/11/03
- Re: OT: automation, Arne Babenhauserheide, 2009/11/04
- Re: OT: automation, olafBuddenhagen, 2009/11/08
- Re: OT: automation, Arne Babenhauserheide, 2009/11/09
- Re: OT: automation, olafBuddenhagen, 2009/11/10
- Re: OT: automation, Arne Babenhauserheide, 2009/11/11
- Re: OT: automation, olafBuddenhagen, 2009/11/14
- Re: OT: automation,
Arne Babenhauserheide <=
- Re: OT: automation, olafBuddenhagen, 2009/11/17