[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: What would it take....
From: |
Samuel Thibault |
Subject: |
Re: What would it take.... |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Dec 2009 17:29:56 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 |
Da Zheng, le Tue 22 Dec 2009 23:04:55 +0800, a écrit :
> I think we need to use process-shared mutexes,
Or better, process-shared condition variables.
> which is what I meant in the beginning.
Ok.
> When we protect the shared variable with a mutex, I don't think we
> need to use RPCs to synchronize two processes, right?
Well, I used "RPC" while I should probably have used "IPC", like a
process-shared mutex or condition variable. Anyway, I believe that's
the same level of difficulty :)
Samuel
- Re: What would it take...., (continued)
Re: What would it take...., Tim Kack, 2009/12/22
Re: What would it take...., Da Zheng, 2009/12/22
Re: What would it take...., Da Zheng, 2009/12/22
Re: What would it take...., Samuel Thibault, 2009/12/22
Re: What would it take...., Da Zheng, 2009/12/22
Re: What would it take...., Samuel Thibault, 2009/12/23
Re: What would it take...., Da Zheng, 2009/12/23
Re: What would it take...., Samuel Thibault, 2009/12/23
Re: What would it take...., Da Zheng, 2009/12/23
Re: What would it take...., Samuel Thibault, 2009/12/23
Re: What would it take...., Samuel Thibault, 2009/12/23