[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Problems with signal delivery
From: |
Arne Babenhauserheide |
Subject: |
Re: Problems with signal delivery |
Date: |
Thu, 2 Sep 2010 22:01:52 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.34-gentoo-r1; KDE/4.5.1; x86_64; ; ) |
On Thursday 02 September 2010 17:56:24 Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Signal handling is known to be crappy in glibc so it's not really a
> surprise. If you can find a fix, that's great, but Roland expected to
> rewrite the whole thing some day.
Actually I would prefer having a fix now to having a clean rewrite someday.
Even better would be a set of small fixes which lead over many ever improved
stable versions to a version which is similar to the one which we’d get with a
clean rewrite :-)
But a fix is no blocker to a rewrite. Rather the opposite: If the fix makes
the Hurd more useful to people, then the chances of a really clean rewrite
become bigger (I think). … Not that this approach worked for Linux, but there
has to be an exception… ;-)
Best wishes,
Arne
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
- Problems with signal delivery, Jeremie Koenig, 2010/09/02
- Re: Problems with signal delivery, Samuel Thibault, 2010/09/02
- Re: Problems with signal delivery,
Arne Babenhauserheide <=
- Re: Problems with signal delivery, Roland McGrath, 2010/09/02
- Re: Problems with signal delivery, Jeremie Koenig, 2010/09/02
- Re: Problems with signal delivery, Roland McGrath, 2010/09/02
- Re: Problems with signal delivery, Neal H. Walfield, 2010/09/03
- Re: Problems with signal delivery, Samuel Thibault, 2010/09/03
- Re: Problems with signal delivery, Jeremie Koenig, 2010/09/04
Re: Problems with signal delivery, Roland McGrath, 2010/09/02
Re: Problems with signal delivery, Jeremie Koenig, 2010/09/02