[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Problems with signal delivery
From: |
Jeremie Koenig |
Subject: |
Re: Problems with signal delivery |
Date: |
Fri, 3 Sep 2010 01:05:10 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 02:15:30PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
> It's not an issue of fixes. The Hurd signal semantics are well-defined
> today. They are not the POSIX-1996 semantics in the presence of multiple
> threads per process.
Do you mean that there is some code relying on these Hurd semantics, and
that therefore we should not try to change them to match POSIX, except
maybe when the pthread functions are used?
--
Jeremie Koenig <jk@jk.fr.eu.org>
http://jk.fr.eu.org
- Problems with signal delivery, Jeremie Koenig, 2010/09/02
- Re: Problems with signal delivery, Samuel Thibault, 2010/09/02
- Re: Problems with signal delivery, Arne Babenhauserheide, 2010/09/02
- Re: Problems with signal delivery, Roland McGrath, 2010/09/02
- Re: Problems with signal delivery,
Jeremie Koenig <=
- Re: Problems with signal delivery, Roland McGrath, 2010/09/02
- Re: Problems with signal delivery, Neal H. Walfield, 2010/09/03
- Re: Problems with signal delivery, Samuel Thibault, 2010/09/03
- Re: Problems with signal delivery, Jeremie Koenig, 2010/09/04
Re: Problems with signal delivery, Roland McGrath, 2010/09/02
Re: Problems with signal delivery, Jeremie Koenig, 2010/09/02