[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Problems with signal delivery
From: |
Samuel Thibault |
Subject: |
Re: Problems with signal delivery |
Date: |
Fri, 3 Sep 2010 21:04:08 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 |
Roland McGrath, le Thu 02 Sep 2010 19:52:42 -0700, a écrit :
> > Do you mean that there is some code relying on these Hurd semantics, and
> > that therefore we should not try to change them to match POSIX, except
> > maybe when the pthread functions are used?
>
> I mean the semantics are the semantics and have been for 15+ years, and we
> can't assume it's OK to just go changing them and call it a "fix". POSIX
> only specifies anything about any kind of multithreadedness when pthread
> functions are used.
Right, I believe it should be feasible to keep the signal sematic of
libthreads and give the posix semantic to libpthread.
Samuel
- Problems with signal delivery, Jeremie Koenig, 2010/09/02
- Re: Problems with signal delivery, Samuel Thibault, 2010/09/02
- Re: Problems with signal delivery, Arne Babenhauserheide, 2010/09/02
- Re: Problems with signal delivery, Roland McGrath, 2010/09/02
- Re: Problems with signal delivery, Jeremie Koenig, 2010/09/02
- Re: Problems with signal delivery, Roland McGrath, 2010/09/02
- Re: Problems with signal delivery, Neal H. Walfield, 2010/09/03
- Re: Problems with signal delivery,
Samuel Thibault <=
- Re: Problems with signal delivery, Jeremie Koenig, 2010/09/04
Re: Problems with signal delivery, Roland McGrath, 2010/09/02
Re: Problems with signal delivery, Jeremie Koenig, 2010/09/02