[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ED error code
From: |
Samuel Thibault |
Subject: |
Re: ED error code |
Date: |
Mon, 1 Nov 2010 17:14:35 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 |
Roland McGrath, le Sun 31 Oct 2010 07:39:20 -0700, a écrit :
> If ED is a problem, then it should just be removed. It's only there as a
> joke. That said, my recollection is that POSIX does reserve all E[A-Z0-9]+
> macro names to the implementation for <errno.h> uses. But I don't really
> recall if that's so.
At least C99 seems to reserve them in §7.26.3:
“Macros that begin with E and a digit or E and an uppercase letter may
be added to the declarations in the <errno.h> header.”
Samuel
- Re: ED error code, Manuel Menal, 2010/11/01
- Re: ED error code, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2010/11/01
- Re: ED error code,
Samuel Thibault <=
- Re: ED error code, Manuel Menal, 2010/11/02
- Re: ED error code, Samuel Thibault, 2010/11/02
- Re: ED error code, Manuel Menal, 2010/11/02
- Re: ED error code, Michael Banck, 2010/11/02
- Re: ED error code, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2010/11/02
- Re: ED error code, olafBuddenhagen, 2010/11/04