[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Hurd stabilty: compiling ghc6
From: |
Oz |
Subject: |
Re: Hurd stabilty: compiling ghc6 |
Date: |
Sat, 2 Apr 2011 23:53:02 -0500 |
i dont know much but i definately second that and agree
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 12:58 PM, <olafBuddenhagen@gmx.net> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 11:13:40AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>
>> Many problems do come from kvm actually. That's one of the reasons why
>> I prefer to use Xen.
>
> VirtualBox is also a good option. It's not as fast as Xen or KVM, but
> much faster than plain QEMU; it doesn't have the stability problems some
> people are seeing with KVM; and it's easier to set up than Xen.
>
> -antrik-
>
>
- Re: Hurd stabilty: compiling ghc6, olafBuddenhagen, 2011/04/02
- Re: Hurd stabilty: compiling ghc6,
Oz <=
- Re: Hurd stabilty: compiling ghc6, Svante Signell, 2011/04/04
- Update: Re: Hurd stabilty: compiling ghc6, Svante Signell, 2011/04/06
- Re: Update: Re: Hurd stabilty: compiling ghc6, Svante Signell, 2011/04/06
- ghc6: Re: Update: ... compiling ghc6, Svante Signell, 2011/04/10
- Re: ghc6: Re: Update: ... compiling ghc6, Svante Signell, 2011/04/12
- Re: ghc6: Re: Update: ... compiling ghc6, Samuel Thibault, 2011/04/12
- Re: ghc6: Re: Update: ... compiling ghc6, Svante Signell, 2011/04/12
- Re: ghc6: Re: Update: ... compiling ghc6, Samuel Thibault, 2011/04/12