[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: XMLFS for GSoC
From: |
olafBuddenhagen |
Subject: |
Re: XMLFS for GSoC |
Date: |
Thu, 7 Apr 2011 21:19:04 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 01:46:02PM +0100, Michael Walker wrote:
> * Read support in unxmlfs
> unxmlfs takes an xmlfs-compatible directory tree and turns it
> into an XML file, thus reading will be done via libtrivfs, with no
> write support (I see no need/use for that).
I do.
The GSoC task description doesn't mention this explicitely; but my grand
vision is using XML as a general directory tree serialisation format.
Note that this requires the directory->XML->directory mapping to work,
which is probably more tricky than XML->directory->XML -- but also much
more useful IMHO. (Also, I'm not sure it's even possible to cover both
cases with the same pair of translators... Might need a different
mapping for each.)
As I said, this task is really mostly about design...
Having said that, the simple case would of course be a good start --
after all, GSoC is more about learning than about producing the ultimate
code :-)
-antrik-
- Re: XMLFS for GSoC, olafBuddenhagen, 2011/04/02
- Re: XMLFS for GSoC, Michael S. Walker, 2011/04/02
- Re: XMLFS for GSoC, Samuel Thibault, 2011/04/02
- Re: XMLFS for GSoC, olafBuddenhagen, 2011/04/05
- Re: XMLFS for GSoC, Samuel Thibault, 2011/04/06
- Re: XMLFS for GSoC, Michael Walker, 2011/04/06
- Re: XMLFS for GSoC, Michael Walker, 2011/04/07
- Re: XMLFS for GSoC,
olafBuddenhagen <=
- Re: XMLFS for GSoC, olafBuddenhagen, 2011/04/07
- Re: XMLFS for GSoC, Michael Walker, 2011/04/07
- Re: XMLFS for GSoC, olafBuddenhagen, 2011/04/07
- Re: XMLFS for GSoC, Michael S. Walker, 2011/04/13