[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RFC for patch to add task_{set,get}_name RPC
From: |
Samuel Thibault |
Subject: |
Re: RFC for patch to add task_{set,get}_name RPC |
Date: |
Thu, 9 May 2013 19:20:39 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21+34 (58baf7c9f32f) (2010-12-30) |
Thomas Schwinge, le Thu 09 May 2013 18:42:18 +0200, a écrit :
> Then, to what extent are the proposed new RPCs just a specialized
> variant of the generic "port info" RPC that we have been musing about,
> <http://darnassus.sceen.net/~hurd-web/open_issues/translate_fd_or_port_to_file_name/>,
> in particular the log from IRC, freenode, #hurd, 2013-03-07? To me it
> would make sense to follow the latter route, so be able to store with
> every generic port some bits of debugging/logging information
Indeed.
> (perhaps literally, like the proposed 32 characters, or perhaps switch
> to dynamically allocated upon setting the information and released
> once the port itself is deallocated),
Either would work, Barry could work on getting the static version
working.
> and that could then be tied to some new --enable-debugging configure
> switch (or simply pinned to --enable-kdb), which, if not specified
> will turn these into MIG_BAD_ID stubs.
Which is fine too.
Samuel
- Re: RFC for patch to add task_{set,get}_name RPC, (continued)
- Re: RFC for patch to add task_{set,get}_name RPC, Samuel Thibault, 2013/05/08
- Re: RFC for patch to add task_{set,get}_name RPC, Roland McGrath, 2013/05/08
- Re: RFC for patch to add task_{set,get}_name RPC, Samuel Thibault, 2013/05/08
- Re: RFC for patch to add task_{set,get}_name RPC, Roland McGrath, 2013/05/08
- Re: RFC for patch to add task_{set,get}_name RPC, Samuel Thibault, 2013/05/08
- Re: RFC for patch to add task_{set,get}_name RPC, Roland McGrath, 2013/05/08
- Re: RFC for patch to add task_{set,get}_name RPC, Samuel Thibault, 2013/05/08
- Re: RFC for patch to add task_{set,get}_name RPC, Samuel Thibault, 2013/05/09
- Re: RFC for patch to add task_{set,get}_name RPC, Barry deFreese, 2013/05/09
- Re: RFC for patch to add task_{set,get}_name RPC, Thomas Schwinge, 2013/05/09
- Re: RFC for patch to add task_{set,get}_name RPC,
Samuel Thibault <=
- Re: RFC for patch to add task_{set,get}_name RPC, Richard Braun, 2013/05/10
- Re: RFC for patch to add task_{set,get}_name RPC, Richard Braun, 2013/05/10