[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate
From: |
Samuel Thibault |
Subject: |
Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate |
Date: |
Fri, 2 May 2014 10:57:13 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21+34 (58baf7c9f32f) (2010-12-30) |
Svante Signell, le Fri 02 May 2014 10:18:12 +0200, a écrit :
> Thread 4 (Thread 1205.4):
> #0 0x019977b7 in _hurd_intr_rpc_msg_in_trap () at intr-msg.c:132
> err = <optimized out>
> err = <optimized out>
> user_option = 3
> user_timeout = 48
> m = 0x532370
> msgh_bits = 0
> remote_port = 268509186
> msgid = 21118
> save_data = <optimized out>
> __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ = "_hurd_intr_rpc_mach_msg"
Ok, reading this again, this looks like what Justus analyzed.
Samuel
- Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, Samuel Thibault, 2014/05/01
- Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, Svante Signell, 2014/05/02
- Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, Svante Signell, 2014/05/02
- Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate,
Samuel Thibault <=
- Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, Samuel Thibault, 2014/05/02
- Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, Samuel Thibault, 2014/05/02
- Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, Svante Signell, 2014/05/02
- Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, Samuel Thibault, 2014/05/02
- Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, Svante Signell, 2014/05/06
- Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, Samuel Thibault, 2014/05/06
- Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, Svante Signell, 2014/05/06
- Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, Samuel Thibault, 2014/05/06
- Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, Svante Signell, 2014/05/06
- Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, Samuel Thibault, 2014/05/06