|
From: | Robert Millan |
Subject: | Re: USB Mass Storage with rump |
Date: | Thu, 24 Sep 2015 12:07:48 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 |
El 24/09/15 a les 00:05, Olaf Buddenhagen ha escrit:
Instead, you could run a Rump instance with USB mass storage only which uses libusb as backend rather than its own *HCI driver (but that requires some coding work as it's currently not implemented ;-))Yeah, I guess that's the price to pay if we want a properly layered driver stack based on an originally monolithic implementation :-) As long as we don't need to jump through hoops to achieve that (and it gets upstream support), I'd say it's worth the effort...
If someone implements a libusb backend for Rump, I think upstream will be more than happy to accept it. On my experience, Rump upstream is demanding in terms of code quality, but very friendly and always open to discuss things. -- Robert Millan
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |