[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ PATCH ] Replace glibc spin-locks with gsync-based locks
From: |
Samuel Thibault |
Subject: |
Re: [ PATCH ] Replace glibc spin-locks with gsync-based locks |
Date: |
Tue, 10 May 2016 08:12:15 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21+34 (58baf7c9f32f) (2010-12-30) |
Hello,
Agustina Arzille, on Mon 09 May 2016 22:45:17 -0300, wrote:
> On 05/08/2016 07:42 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> >512M is not so much, perhaps use more as Richard suggested.
>
> I did try that, and got farther than before (Thanks, Richard!). On the other
> hand, glibc's testsuite failed during math/tgmath2, after a crash.
Just to make sure: are you building the debian package, or from our
hurd/glibc.git tree? In the debian package at least, the testsuite
should be going on, and give a regression summary: quite a few tests are
"expected" to fail. tgmath2 is however not in the list. Did you check
that it did not fail without your patch?
> Oh, right. Well, we would need to change something in gnumach for that, right?
Yes.
Samuel
Re: [ PATCH ] Replace glibc spin-locks with gsync-based locks, Kalle Olavi Niemitalo, 2016/05/09
Re: [ PATCH ] Replace glibc spin-locks with gsync-based locks, Samuel Thibault, 2016/05/13