[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: checking whether mig supports the retcode keyword... no
|
From: |
Sergey Bugaev |
|
Subject: |
Re: checking whether mig supports the retcode keyword... no |
|
Date: |
Fri, 17 Feb 2023 14:26:28 +0300 |
On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 9:02 AM Flávio Cruz <flaviocruz@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for the instructions. I discovered that mach_msg_type_long_t does not
> align to 8 bytes so it also needs a bit of padding just like mach_msg_type_t.
> See my last patch. I was able to compile most of the glibc and all the stubs
> after this change.
That worked like a charm, thank you!
with desired_complex_alignof manually set to 8, that is. Right now it
is set to sizeof(natural_t) -- i.e. 4. Should we change it to
alignof(uintptr_t) or something like that?
Sergey