[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 0/5] basic syscall support on x86_64
From: |
Samuel Thibault |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 0/5] basic syscall support on x86_64 |
Date: |
Mon, 27 Feb 2023 23:02:31 +0100 |
User-agent: |
NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3) |
Luca Dariz, le lun. 27 févr. 2023 21:44:56 +0100, a ecrit:
> This enables simple user-space programs compiled for x86_64. Regular
> syscalls should work, RPCs are not yet properly working:
> * the commit "fix port name copyin" is just to make simple rpc work
> * To test the syscalls I patched mig to not add the _Static_assert()
> statements, otherwise gnumach fails to build.
Just a few questions and bits, thanks!
Samuel
- Re: [PATCH 5/5] x86_64: add 64-bit syscall entry point, (continued)
- Re: [PATCH 5/5] x86_64: add 64-bit syscall entry point, Sergey Bugaev, 2023/02/28
- Re: [PATCH 5/5] x86_64: add 64-bit syscall entry point, Samuel Thibault, 2023/02/28
- Re: [PATCH 5/5] x86_64: add 64-bit syscall entry point, Sergey Bugaev, 2023/02/28
- Re: [PATCH 5/5] x86_64: add 64-bit syscall entry point, Samuel Thibault, 2023/02/28
- Re: [PATCH 5/5] x86_64: add 64-bit syscall entry point, Sergey Bugaev, 2023/02/28
Re: [PATCH 5/5] x86_64: add 64-bit syscall entry point, Sergey Bugaev, 2023/02/28
Re: [PATCH 0/5] basic syscall support on x86_64,
Samuel Thibault <=