[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RFC PATCH glibc 10/34] stdio-common: Fix building when !IS_IN (libc
From: |
Samuel Thibault |
Subject: |
Re: [RFC PATCH glibc 10/34] stdio-common: Fix building when !IS_IN (libc) |
Date: |
Mon, 3 Apr 2023 01:01:15 +0200 |
User-agent: |
NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3) |
Applied, thanks!
Sergey Bugaev, le dim. 19 mars 2023 18:09:53 +0300, a ecrit:
> In this case, _itoa_word () is already defined inline in the header (see
> sysdeps/generic/_itoa.h), and the second definition causes an error.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sergey Bugaev <bugaevc@gmail.com>
> ---
> stdio-common/_itoa.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/stdio-common/_itoa.c b/stdio-common/_itoa.c
> index 27285193..3037b0f5 100644
> --- a/stdio-common/_itoa.c
> +++ b/stdio-common/_itoa.c
> @@ -157,6 +157,7 @@ const struct base_table_t _itoa_base_table[]
> attribute_hidden =
> };
> #endif
>
> +#if IS_IN (libc)
> char *
> _itoa_word (_ITOA_WORD_TYPE value, char *buflim,
> unsigned int base, int upper_case)
> @@ -185,6 +186,7 @@ _itoa_word (_ITOA_WORD_TYPE value, char *buflim,
> return buflim;
> }
> #undef SPECIAL
> +#endif /* IS_IN (libc) */
>
>
> #if _ITOA_NEEDED
> --
> 2.39.2
>
--
Samuel
---
Pour une évaluation indépendante, transparente et rigoureuse !
Je soutiens la Commission d'Évaluation de l'Inria.
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: [RFC PATCH glibc 10/34] stdio-common: Fix building when !IS_IN (libc),
Samuel Thibault <=