bug-hurd
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[RFC PATCH v3 3/6] hurd: Replace reply port with a dead name on failed i


From: Sergey Bugaev
Subject: [RFC PATCH v3 3/6] hurd: Replace reply port with a dead name on failed interruption
Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2023 23:18:19 +0300

If we're trying to interrupt an interruptible RPC, but the server fails
to respond to our __interrupt_operation () call, we instead destroy the
reply port we were expecting the reply to the RPC on.

Instead of deallocating the name completely, replace it with a dead
name, so the name won't get reused for some other right, and deallocate
it in _hurd_intr_rpc_mach_msg once we return from the signal handler.

Signed-off-by: Sergey Bugaev <bugaevc@gmail.com>
---
This is not required for x86_64, but probably a good idea anyway. I have
checked that this does not fatally break things (this commit has been
sitting in my tree, getting built along with the other changes, for quite
some time without noticably breaking anything), but I have not run the
full testsuite. Please do that on your end.

 hurd/hurdsig.c                | 15 ++++++++++++---
 hurd/intr-msg.c               |  1 +
 sysdeps/mach/hurd/mig-reply.c | 25 +++++++------------------
 3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hurd/hurdsig.c b/hurd/hurdsig.c
index b3808f9e..78ea59d9 100644
--- a/hurd/hurdsig.c
+++ b/hurd/hurdsig.c
@@ -477,9 +477,18 @@ _hurdsig_abort_rpcs (struct hurd_sigstate *ss, int signo, 
int sigthread,
           if (reply)
             {
               /* The interrupt didn't work.
-                 Destroy the receive right the thread is blocked on.  */
-              __mach_port_destroy (__mach_task_self (), *reply);
-              *reply = MACH_PORT_NULL;
+                 Destroy the receive right the thread is blocked on, and
+                 replace it with a dead name to keep the name from reuse until
+                 the therad is done with it.  To do this atomically, first
+                 insert a send right, and then destroy the receive right,
+                 turning the send right into a dead name.  */
+              err = __mach_port_insert_right (__mach_task_self (),
+                                              *reply, *reply,
+                                              MACH_MSG_TYPE_MAKE_SEND);
+              assert_perror (err);
+              err = __mach_port_mod_refs (__mach_task_self (), *reply,
+                                          MACH_PORT_RIGHT_RECEIVE, -1);
+              assert_perror (err);
             }
 
           /* The system call return value register now contains
diff --git a/hurd/intr-msg.c b/hurd/intr-msg.c
index 1a086b51..716d87ab 100644
--- a/hurd/intr-msg.c
+++ b/hurd/intr-msg.c
@@ -305,6 +305,7 @@ _hurd_intr_rpc_mach_msg (mach_msg_header_t *msg,
        {
          /* Make sure we have a valid reply port.  The one we were using
             may have been destroyed by interruption.  */
+         __mig_dealloc_reply_port (rcv_name);
          m->header.msgh_local_port = rcv_name = __mig_get_reply_port ();
          m->header.msgh_bits = msgh_bits;
          option = user_option;
diff --git a/sysdeps/mach/hurd/mig-reply.c b/sysdeps/mach/hurd/mig-reply.c
index 3fdee80e..7ea001df 100644
--- a/sysdeps/mach/hurd/mig-reply.c
+++ b/sysdeps/mach/hurd/mig-reply.c
@@ -69,29 +69,18 @@ __mig_dealloc_reply_port (mach_port_t arg)
   mach_port_t port = get_reply_port ();
 
   set_reply_port (MACH_PORT_NULL);     /* So the mod_refs RPC won't use it.  */
-
-  /* Normally, ARG should be the same as PORT that we store.  However, if a
-     signal has interrupted the RPC, the stored PORT has been deallocated and
-     reset to MACH_PORT_NULL (or possibly MACH_PORT_DEAD).  In this case the
-     MIG routine still has the old name, which it passes to us here.  We must
-     not deallocate (or otherwise touch) it, since it may be already allocated
-     to another port right.  Fortunately MIG itself doesn't do anything with
-     the reply port on errors either, other than immediately calling this
-     function.
-
-     And so:
-     1. Assert that things are sane, i.e. and PORT is either invalid or same
-        as ARG.
-     2. Only deallocate the name if our stored PORT still names it.  In that
-        case we're sure the right has not been deallocated / the name reused.
-    */
-
+  assert (port == arg);
   if (!MACH_PORT_VALID (port))
     return;
-  assert (port == arg);
 
   err = __mach_port_mod_refs (__mach_task_self (), port,
                               MACH_PORT_RIGHT_RECEIVE, -1);
+  if (err == KERN_INVALID_RIGHT)
+    /* It could be that during signal handling, the receive right had been
+       replaced with a dead name.  */
+    err = __mach_port_mod_refs (__mach_task_self (), port,
+                                MACH_PORT_RIGHT_DEAD_NAME, -1);
+
   assert_perror (err);
 }
 weak_alias (__mig_dealloc_reply_port, mig_dealloc_reply_port)
-- 
2.40.1




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]