[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 3/3] x86_64: fix descriptor loading for 64-bit addresses
From: |
Samuel Thibault |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 3/3] x86_64: fix descriptor loading for 64-bit addresses |
Date: |
Sun, 21 May 2023 19:59:57 +0200 |
User-agent: |
NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3) |
Applied, thanks!
Luca Dariz, le dim. 21 mai 2023 10:57:58 +0200, a ecrit:
> * i386/i386/seg.h: use proper type for segment addresses. This is not
> impacting any functionality on 64-bit, as segments limits are
> ignored, but at least we silence a warning.
> ---
> i386/i386/seg.h | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/i386/i386/seg.h b/i386/i386/seg.h
> index 71c05e49..673d1d9f 100644
> --- a/i386/i386/seg.h
> +++ b/i386/i386/seg.h
> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
> #define _I386_SEG_H_
>
> #include <mach/inline.h>
> +#include <mach/machine/vm_types.h>
>
> /*
> * i386 segmentation.
> @@ -181,7 +182,7 @@ static inline void lldt(unsigned short ldt_selector)
>
> /* Fill a segment descriptor. */
> static inline void
> -fill_descriptor(struct real_descriptor *_desc, unsigned base, unsigned limit,
> +fill_descriptor(struct real_descriptor *_desc, vm_offset_t base, vm_offset_t
> limit,
> unsigned char access, unsigned char sizebits)
> {
> /* TODO: when !MACH_PV_DESCRIPTORS, setting desc and just memcpy isn't
> simpler actually */
> --
> 2.30.2
>
>
--
Samuel
---
Pour une évaluation indépendante, transparente et rigoureuse !
Je soutiens la Commission d'Évaluation de l'Inria.