[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 64bit startup
From: |
Samuel Thibault |
Subject: |
Re: 64bit startup |
Date: |
Fri, 26 May 2023 12:48:11 +0200 |
User-agent: |
NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3) |
Sergey Bugaev, le ven. 26 mai 2023 13:10:23 +0300, a ecrit:
> On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 12:57 PM Samuel Thibault
> <samuel.thibault@gnu.org> wrote:
> > > And the addresses seem well above the 4 GB limit;
> >
> > Which addresses?
>
> These ones:
>
> > 0xffffffff8107a712(0,8101d463,400ee0,ffffffff8101d49c,0)
> > 0xffffffff8106ff27(ffffffffde739868,ffffffff8101d463,ffffffffde736fb8,0,ffffffff8104ceec
These are from the kernel backtrace.
When you talk about Luca's change, do you mean
6a46db9fe035c26ab549bc0b681469fc650141d6 which is applied since long, or
222020cff440921e987dcd92e308dd775e5d543d?
I tried to revert to 95bf57a0625140e4b60f817150cb516bda65b446, but I am
getting the same result.
Samuel
- Re: 64bit startup, (continued)
- Re: 64bit startup, Luca, 2023/05/26
- Re: 64bit startup, Samuel Thibault, 2023/05/26
- Re: 64bit startup, Luca, 2023/05/26
- Re: 64bit startup, Samuel Thibault, 2023/05/26
- Re: 64bit startup, Samuel Thibault, 2023/05/26
- Re: 64bit startup, Sergey Bugaev, 2023/05/26
- Re: 64bit startup, Sergey Bugaev, 2023/05/26
Re: 64bit startup, Sergey Bugaev, 2023/05/26
- Re: 64bit startup, Samuel Thibault, 2023/05/26
- Re: 64bit startup, Sergey Bugaev, 2023/05/26
- Re: 64bit startup,
Samuel Thibault <=
- Re: 64bit startup, Sergey Bugaev, 2023/05/26
- Re: 64bit startup, Samuel Thibault, 2023/05/26
- Re: 64bit startup, Sergey Bugaev, 2023/05/26
- Re: 64bit startup, Samuel Thibault, 2023/05/27
- Re: 64bit startup, Samuel Thibault, 2023/05/27
- Re: 64bit startup, Samuel Thibault, 2023/05/27
- Re: 64bit startup, Samuel Thibault, 2023/05/27
- Re: 64bit startup, Samuel Thibault, 2023/05/27
- Re: 64bit startup, Samuel Thibault, 2023/05/27
- Re: 64bit startup, Samuel Thibault, 2023/05/27