bug-hurd
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] include/fcntl.h: Define O_IGNORE_CTTY


From: Sergey Bugaev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] include/fcntl.h: Define O_IGNORE_CTTY
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2023 12:29:23 +0300

Hello,

On Mon, Jun 5, 2023 at 9:25 PM Adhemerval Zanella Netto
<adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org> wrote:
> We currently are trying to avoid the
> "#ifdef ...", so a code that does not define, where is should, would fail
> at compile time.

Yes, this makes perfect sense, and it was something I was also
slightly concerned about (what if the Hurd's real definition stops
being brought in by include/fcntl.h for some reason? -- then we'd just
silently get a 0, and nobody would notice). On the other hand I wanted
to not cause any additional troubles for other potential ports
(FreeBSD), but maybe it's fine to require them to just add their own
little header.

Do you think the Linux port should define O_IGNORE_CTTY to O_NOCTTY
and not to 0?

> I think it would be better to add a sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/fcntl.h which
> defines O_IGNORE_CTTY  unconditionally and include the default one (either
> directly or though include_next.h).

Could you please clarify how this whole system of file overrides
works? (I mean: a more specific sysdep file, for some unclear
definition of "specific", automatically overriding a less specific
file of the same basename.)

I think I've seen vpath get used somewhere, so I would guess that the
sysdep (and other) directories are added to vpath order by their
priority, and whichever one Make finds first, it passes to the
compiler. Header files, I would guess again, are simply handled by
passing all the paths (once again properly sorted) with -I, and it's
the compiler that looks for the first directory that contains file of
the given name -- this makes it possible to #include_next, and this
must also be how include/ contains headers that are used during libc
compilation but not installed (include/ must not be on the vpath
then?).

But this brings me to the more specific question: the headers to be
installed are also found using vpath during 'make install', right? How
would this work, will Make somehow know to not install this
sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/fcntl.h file that you're proposing, and keep
installing io/fcntl.h?

Sergey



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]