[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[PATCH 1/5] x86_64: fix stack handling on recursive interrupts for USER3
From: |
Luca Dariz |
Subject: |
[PATCH 1/5] x86_64: fix stack handling on recursive interrupts for USER32 |
Date: |
Sat, 29 Jul 2023 19:47:49 +0200 |
* x86_64/locore.S: ensure the thread state is filled completely even
on recursive interrups. The value of the segment selectors is not
very important in this case, but we still need to align the stack to
the bottom of i386_interrupt_state.
---
x86_64/locore.S | 16 +++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/x86_64/locore.S b/x86_64/locore.S
index 16b0dde5..ac7138b7 100644
--- a/x86_64/locore.S
+++ b/x86_64/locore.S
@@ -752,17 +752,17 @@ ENTRY(all_intrs)
pushq %r11
cld /* clear direction flag */
- movq %rsp,%rdx /* on an interrupt stack? */
- and $(~(INTSTACK_SIZE-1)),%rdx
- cmpq %ss:EXT(int_stack_base),%rdx
- je int_from_intstack /* if not: */
-
movq %ds,%rdx /* save segment registers */
pushq %rdx
movq %es,%rdx
pushq %rdx
PUSH_FSGS_ISR
+ movq %rsp,%rdx /* on an interrupt stack? */
+ and $(~(INTSTACK_SIZE-1)),%rdx
+ cmpq %ss:EXT(int_stack_base),%rdx
+ je int_from_intstack /* if not: */
+
mov %ss,%dx /* switch to kernel segments */
mov %dx,%ds
mov %dx,%es
@@ -830,6 +830,12 @@ int_from_intstack:
jb stack_overflowed /* if not: */
call EXT(interrupt) /* call interrupt routine */
_return_to_iret_i: /* ( label for kdb_kintr) */
+ POP_FSGS_ISR
+ pop %rdx
+ mov %rdx,%es
+ pop %rdx
+ mov %rdx,%ds
+
pop %r11
pop %r10
pop %r9
--
2.39.2
- [PATCH 1/5] x86_64: fix stack handling on recursive interrupts for USER32,
Luca Dariz <=