bug-hurd
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 64bit startup


From: Samuel Thibault
Subject: Re: 64bit startup
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2023 09:46:24 +0200
User-agent: NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3)

Jeffrey Walton, le mar. 24 oct. 2023 22:00:54 -0400, a ecrit:
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 9:56 PM Jessica Clarke <jrtc27@debian.org> wrote:
> >
> > On 25 Oct 2023, at 02:40, Jeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 9:33 PM Jessica Clarke <jrtc27@debian.org> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On 25 Oct 2023, at 02:26, Jeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 6:21 PM Samuel Thibault 
> > >>> <samuel.thibault@gnu.org> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Some update on the 64bit port:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> - The debian-ports archive now has enough packages to bootstrap a
> > >>>> chroot.
> > >>>> - A 64bit debian buildd is getting set up, not much work is left there.
> > >>>> - The hurd-amd64 wanna-build infrastructure is to be set up in the
> > >>>> coming days.
> > >>>
> > >>> Congrats
> > >>>
> > >>>> *but*
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Building packages is not very stable. I have been trying to build
> > >>>> gcc-13 for a couple of weeks, without success so far. There are various
> > >>>> failures, most often odd errors in the libtool script, which are a sign
> > >>>> that the system itself is not behaving correctly. A way to reproduce
> > >>>> the issue is to just repeatedly build a package that is using libtool,
> > >>>> sooner or later that will fail very oddly.
> > >>>
> > >>> lol... <https://harmful.cat-v.org/software/GCC> and
> > >>
> > >> Yeah can we not spread this kind of vile rhetoric here? Regardless of
> > >> how much truth is in that, and whether it holds today, that kind of
> > >> language isn’t something we should be celebrating and encouraging
> > >> others to read. Let’s keep things more civil and on topic.
> > >
> > > My apologies for offending your delicate sensibilities.
> >
> > 1. I did not say I was offended. I said it was vile rhetoric. It does
> >    not personally offend me, but that does not mean I want to see it
> >    being circulated on these kinds of mailing lists.
> 
> Your overreaction. It looks like the stuff I would expect to see on
> social media, like one of those binary confused persons crying someone
> is perpetrating a hate crime because the wrong pronoun (subject?) was
> used.

*You* are overracting here.

Samuel



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]