[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 64bit startup
From: |
Samuel Thibault |
Subject: |
Re: 64bit startup |
Date: |
Fri, 27 Oct 2023 01:05:11 +0200 |
User-agent: |
NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3) |
Samuel Thibault, le mer. 25 oct. 2023 00:04:33 +0200, a ecrit:
> Building packages is not very stable. I have been trying to build
> gcc-13 for a couple of weeks, without success so far. There are various
> failures, most often odd errors in the libtool script, which are a sign
> that the system itself is not behaving correctly. A way to reproduce
> the issue is to just repeatedly build a package that is using libtool,
> sooner or later that will fail very oddly.
>
> This means that while the buildd will be ready, I'm really not at ease
> with letting it start, knowing that it can behave erratically.
Actually, until gcc-13 actually builds, nothing else can build since
libc depends on libgcc.
Samuel
- Re: 64bit startup, (continued)
- Re: 64bit startup, Samuel Thibault, 2023/10/25
- Re: 64bit startup, jbranso, 2023/10/24
- Re: 64bit startup, Samuel Thibault, 2023/10/25
- Re: 64bit startup, jbranso, 2023/10/25
- Re: 64bit startup, Samuel Thibault, 2023/10/25
- Re: 64bit startup, Samuel Thibault, 2023/10/25
- Re: 64bit startup, Samuel Thibault, 2023/10/26
- Re: 64bit startup, Sergey Bugaev, 2023/10/25
- Re: 64bit startup, Samuel Thibault, 2023/10/25
Re: 64bit startup, Martin Steigerwald, 2023/10/25
Re: 64bit startup,
Samuel Thibault <=