bug-hurd
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Are you doing this too for GNU/Hurd?


From: Samuel Thibault
Subject: Re: Are you doing this too for GNU/Hurd?
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 18:15:12 +0100
User-agent: NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3)

Svante Signell, le jeu. 22 févr. 2024 18:13:50 +0100, a ecrit:
> On Thu, 2024-02-22 at 17:43 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Svante Signell, le jeu. 22 févr. 2024 17:36:15 +0100, a ecrit:
> > > Changes:
> > > ...
> > >  gcc-13 (13.2.0-14) experimental; urgency=medium
> > > * Pass -D_TIME_BITS=64 together with -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 by
> > > default
> > >      on the 32bit architectures armel, armhf, hppa, m68k, mips,
> > > mipsel,
> > >      powerpc (-m32 only) and sh4.
> > > ...
> > 
> > No, just like it's not planned for i386.
> 
> And why is it not planned for i386?

I won't rehash the whole complex rationale that was discussed. What I
essentially remember from it is that since this changes the ABI, this
breaks compatibility with pre-built binaries downloadable from the
Internet, so better leave them with the y2038 problem until then rather
than breaking them now.

Concerning the Hurd were we don't really have that problem, it's still a
lot of work while on the long run we should just migrate to amd64.

Samuel



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]