[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug-inetutils] Re: route
From: |
Richard M. Stallman |
Subject: |
[bug-inetutils] Re: route |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Sep 2008 21:13:07 -0400 |
While it is true that somethings become easier when using a library,
some don't. We cannot possibly know if the author intends to support
legacy GNU/Liniux systems. Nor do we know if the API will be stable,
I did a quick check and it seems that libnl has only existed since
late 2007 (this was when the git tree was created, maybe it dates back
to before that?). If the library is that new, we definitly cannot
depend on it for core functionality.
The general principles you've cited are valid, but we have
to apply them based on the specific facts.
For instance, given that the GNOME NetworkManager depends on it, there
will be lots of pressure to maintain libnl on all distros and support
old versions. I think we can take it as given that that will be done.
- [bug-inetutils] Re: route, (continued)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- [bug-inetutils] Re: route, Debarshi Ray, 2008/09/28
- [bug-inetutils] Re: route, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2008/09/28
- Re: [bug-inetutils] Re: route, Jeff Bailey, 2008/09/28
- Re: [bug-inetutils] Re: route, Debarshi Ray, 2008/09/28
- Re: [bug-inetutils] Re: route, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2008/09/28
- Re: [bug-inetutils] Re: route, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2008/09/28
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- [bug-inetutils] Re: route, Debarshi Ray, 2008/09/29
- [bug-inetutils] Re: route, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2008/09/29
- [bug-inetutils] Re: route, Debarshi Ray, 2008/09/29
- [bug-inetutils] Re: route, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2008/09/29
- [bug-inetutils] Re: route,
Richard M. Stallman <=