Re: 2.22: unexpected bar numbering when using * lengths and skipBars

[David Kastrup]

"Silas S. Brown" <ssb22@cam.ac.uk> writes:

>> Hm.  Josquin des Prez is sort of borderline here...
>> <https://i.stack.imgur.com/o9xlY.png>
>
> Hi, yes that has notes going across barlines.  But wouldn't that
> cause "barcheck failed" warnings anyway, even apart from the
> notes using a multiplier?

Why would you put bar checks in the middle of a note?

> (e.g. the dotted minim already goes across a barline)

Sure, but not across a bar check unless you put one there.

> I can see why we wouldn't want those warnings to be errors (at least
> not by default), but I can't see why we wouldn't want 'barcheck
> failed' warnings whenever ANY note goes across a barline (other than
> via a tie), for whatever reason.  It's a really useful warning for
> double-checking the entered durations in "normal" music.

Not sure what you consider normal.

-- 
David Kastrup