[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug #61594] suggest new $(hash ...) function
From: |
anonymous |
Subject: |
[bug #61594] suggest new $(hash ...) function |
Date: |
Tue, 30 Nov 2021 23:36:43 -0500 (EST) |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/96.0.4664.55 Safari/537.36 |
URL:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?61594>
Summary: suggest new $(hash ...) function
Project: make
Submitted by: None
Submitted on: Wed 01 Dec 2021 04:36:41 AM UTC
Severity: 3 - Normal
Item Group: Enhancement
Status: None
Privacy: Public
Assigned to: None
Open/Closed: Open
Discussion Lock: Any
Component Version: SCM
Operating System: None
Fixed Release: None
Triage Status: None
_______________________________________________________
Details:
Historically there's been a certain amount of resistance to adding new native
functions to GNU make but a few have come in lately so ... I wonder if the
idea of providing a hashing function has been considered?
I'm not thinking of a cryptographically secure hash, just something that could
be used as a convenient digital signature. The use case I'm thinking of in
particular is the advanced topic of forcing rebuild on command-line changes,
which of course requires stashing the previous command line for comparison.
Unfortunately, in some cases command lines can be very long and ugly; in our
case they're >2K chars apiece. Stashing these can be done, and in fact we do
it, but it would be much nicer and simpler if a SHA-1 or similar signature
could be stashed instead.
It seems relatively easy to implement and document, assuming the GNU hashing
functions are available somehow. The question in my mind, if it was to go
forward, would be whether to give it a specific name and nail down the
algorithm, such as $(sha-3,$(data)), or a generic name like $(hash,$(data)).
Historically every hashing algorithm has been superseded by a better one every
few years, which argues for $(hash ...), but on the other hand it's not
intended for security anyway so anything with a sufficiently infinitesimal
collision rate would be fine and there might be value in being able to
generate a known hash like SHA-1.
Just a thought. Close with prejudice if not interested.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?61594>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [bug #61594] suggest new $(hash ...) function,
anonymous <=