[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
parted boot disk shell cp failure
From: |
Ron |
Subject: |
parted boot disk shell cp failure |
Date: |
Mon, 02 Jul 2001 14:59:57 -0400 |
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 01:59:51PM -0400, Ron wrote:
> > I have the parted bootdisk 1.4.5. I used the shell cp command to copy
> > part of a partition to a new partition. However, the cp command did not
> > copy the owner & group numbers, but set them all to 0 on every file it
> > copied! Is this a bug or a feature of the shell that you're using in
> > the parted bootdisk?
>
> Which "cp" did you use? The "cp" from within parted, like this:
>
> (parted) cp A B
> where A and B are partition numbers
>
> to copy from partition A to partition B?
>
> Or, the shell command:
>
> # cp -r / /somewhere-else
>
> If you are talking about the first case... then it's a bug. If the
> later, then that's how cp(1) always works! (And you've probably
> got a bit confused, and should be using the first one...)
>
> Andrew Clausen
OK, I'll admit I got a little confused and also explaining this is a
little confusing. I am referring to the shell copy command "# cp",
not the parted copy command. (The original post does indeed state
this!) When using a command such as "# cp -p -r /dir1 /dir2" the
"-p" switch does not work, so all files copied end up belonging to
root! I see now (by typing "# cp --help") that the "-p" switch is
not available! (The "# mv" command does not preserve file
attributes either.)
The reason not to use the parted cp command is because I wanted to
split the partition, not copy the whole thing.
No, this is not a bug in parted, but it is a limitation of the shell
used by the boot disk. I guess I'm suggesting putting a more powerful
"cp" command in the shell of the boot disk in order to copy portions
of partitions when repartitioning a system.
Just some food for thought. No need for any reply.
Ron
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- parted boot disk shell cp failure,
Ron <=