[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Parted resizing FAT32 => overwriting?
From: |
Andrew Clausen |
Subject: |
Re: Parted resizing FAT32 => overwriting? |
Date: |
Thu, 11 Mar 2004 18:04:53 +1100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 06:33:54PM -0600, Ryan Underwood wrote:
> Thanks, that is exactly what I needed to know. Is there a note about
> this in the documentation or help?
No, good suggestion...
> > This is unlikely, unless your fat32 file system was very full, and
> > more space was needed for the file allocation tables at the start...
>
> Ok, the reason I thought it might have done some sort of
> "reorganization" is because it took a _long_time_. Like almost an hour
> and a half. Do you have any idea why it would have taken so long simply
That is strange... it should never take that long.
> Do you have any idea why it would have taken so long simply
> to resize a FAT32 filesystem from 8->20GB?
It would have needed to change the cluster size, and update all the
directory entries, but 1.5 hours is surprising.
> PartitionMagic usually only takes such a long time when it is required
> to shuffle data to different parts of the partition, which is why I
> was nervous that the partition was overwritten.
Parted should be the same in this respect. I will have to
investigate...
Cheers,
Andrew