[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Failures trying to resize an SD card partition
From: |
Ben Webster |
Subject: |
Failures trying to resize an SD card partition |
Date: |
Wed, 11 Oct 2006 14:07:17 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.4 |
I was trying to resize the last partition on an SD card. I've copied and
pasted the output of the recommended line, and also the input/output from the
failed session itself:
parted /dev/sdb print unit s print unit chs print
Disk /dev/sdb: 512MB
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
Partition Table: msdos
Disk /dev/sdb: 1000447s
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
Partition Table: msdos
From the actual failed session:
Disk /dev/sdb: 1953,15,31
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
BIOS cylinder,head,sector geometry: 1954,16,32. Each cylinder is 262kB.
Partition Table: msdos
Number Start End Type File system Flags
1 0,1,0 5,15,31 primary
2 6,0,0 9,15,31 primary ext2
3 19,0,0 952,15,31 primary ext2
Information: Don't forget to update /etc/fstab, if necessary.
(parted) print
Disk /dev/sdb: 512MB
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
Partition Table: msdos
Number Start End Size Type File system Flags
1 16.4kB 1573kB 1556kB primary
2 1573kB 2621kB 1049kB primary ext2
3 4981kB 250MB 245MB primary ext2
(parted) resize
Partition number? 3
Start? [4981kB]?
End? [250MB]? 500MB
Warning: A resize operation on this file system will use EXPERIMENTAL code
that MAY CORRUPT it (although it hasn't doneso yet
in the past).
You should at least backup your data and run 'e2fsck -f' afterwards.
OK/Cancel? OK
You found a bug in GNU Parted! Here's what you have to do:
Don't panic! The bug has most likely not affected any of your data.
Help us to fix this bug by doing the following:
Check whether the bug has already been fixed by checking
the last version of GNU Parted that you can find at:
http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/parted/
Please check this version prior to bug reporting.
If this has not been fixed yet or if you don't know how to check,
please visit the GNU Parted website:
http://www.gnu.org/software/parted
for further information.
Your report should contain the version of this release (1.7.1)
along with the error message below, the output of
parted DEVICE unit co print unit s print
and additional information about your setup you consider important.
Assertion (block < EXT2_SUPER_BLOCKS_COUNT(fs->sb)) at
../../../../libparted/fs/ext2/ext2.h:226 in function ext2_is_data_block()
failed.
Ignore/Cancel? Cancel
Warning: Block 246014 shouldn't have been marked (0, 0)!
You found a bug in GNU Parted! Here's what you have to do:
Don't panic! The bug has most likely not affected any of your data.
Help us to fix this bug by doing the following:
Check whether the bug has already been fixed by checking
the last version of GNU Parted that you can find at:
http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/parted/
Please check this version prior to bug reporting.
If this has not been fixed yet or if you don't know how to check,
please visit the GNU Parted website:
http://www.gnu.org/software/parted
for further information.
Your report should contain the version of this release (1.7.1)
along with the error message below, the output of
parted DEVICE unit co print unit s print
and additional information about your setup you consider important.
Assertion (block < EXT2_SUPER_BLOCKS_COUNT(fs->sb)) at
../../../../libparted/fs/ext2/ext2.h:226 in function ext2_is_data_block()
failed.
Ignore/Cancel?
Ignore/Cancel? cancel
Warning: Block 246015 shouldn't have been marked (0, 0)!
You found a bug in GNU Parted! Here's what you have to do:
Don't panic! The bug has most likely not affected any of your data.
Help us to fix this bug by doing the following:
Check whether the bug has already been fixed by checking
the last version of GNU Parted that you can find at:
http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/parted/
Please check this version prior to bug reporting.
If this has not been fixed yet or if you don't know how to check,
please visit the GNU Parted website:
http://www.gnu.org/software/parted
for further information.
Your report should contain the version of this release (1.7.1)
along with the error message below, the output of
parted DEVICE unit co print unit s print
and additional information about your setup you consider important.
Assertion (block < EXT2_SUPER_BLOCKS_COUNT(fs->sb)) at
../../../../libparted/fs/ext2/ext2.h:226 in function ext2_is_data_block()
failed.
Ignore/Cancel? c
Warning: Block 246016 shouldn't have been marked (0, 0)!
Error: Attempt to read sectors -2--1 outside of partition on /dev/sdb.
Ignore/Cancel? c
You found a bug in GNU Parted! Here's what you have to do:
Don't panic! The bug has most likely not affected any of your data.
Help us to fix this bug by doing the following:
Check whether the bug has already been fixed by checking
the last version of GNU Parted that you can find at:
http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/parted/
Please check this version prior to bug reporting.
If this has not been fixed yet or if you don't know how to check,
please visit the GNU Parted website:
http://www.gnu.org/software/parted
for further information.
Your report should contain the version of this release (1.7.1)
along with the error message below, the output of
parted DEVICE unit co print unit s print
and additional information about your setup you consider important.
Error: SEGV_MAPERR (Address not mapped to object)Aborted
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Failures trying to resize an SD card partition,
Ben Webster <=