Re: [bug-patch] [PATCH] emit one more diagnostic with the required "prog

bug-patch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [bug-patch] [PATCH] emit one more diagnostic with the required "prog

From:	Andreas Gruenbacher
Subject:	Re: [bug-patch] [PATCH] emit one more diagnostic with the required "program_name: " prefix
Date:	Wed, 25 May 2011 14:47:24 +0200
User-agent:	KMail/1.12.4 (Linux/2.6.36-rc7+; KDE/4.3.5; i686; ; )

On Tuesday 24 May 2011 15:52:40 Jim Meyering wrote:
> I noticed the lone use of "perror" to diagnose this failure.
> Here's a fix:

Make sense.

Thanks,
Andreas

[Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

[bug-patch] [PATCH] emit one more diagnostic with the required "program_name: " prefix, Jim Meyering, 2011/05/24
- Re: [bug-patch] [PATCH] emit one more diagnostic with the required "program_name: " prefix, Andreas Gruenbacher <=

Prev by Date: Re: [bug-patch] [PATCH] avoid a used-uninitialized error
Next by Date: Re: [bug-patch] [PATCH] remove side effect from assert
Previous by thread: [bug-patch] [PATCH] emit one more diagnostic with the required "program_name: " prefix
Next by thread: [bug-patch] [PATCH] don't call fdopen with a negative FD upon dup failure
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread