[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-stow] Small feature requests...
From: |
Gaël Roualland |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-stow] Small feature requests... |
Date: |
Wed, 11 Jun 2003 15:35:45 +0200 (CEST) |
Alfred M. Szmidt a écrit :
> > > o --copy-instead-of-link=DEST[,DEST1, ...]
> > >
> > > This would copy all files that would end up in DEST instead of
> > > symlinking them. And example use of this might be to have no
> > > symlinks in /etc, but literal files, and have the original files in
> > > the package directory. Note that this should probobly not abort on
> > > conflicts...
> >
> > I am not sure about this one. It may confuse people. What do you think
> > Gael ?
>
> Hum, how are you supposed to unstow then ? By comparing files, to
> know if it's the right one ? I can understand the need, but I'm not
> sure it really fits stow's usage...
>
> Unstowing would do nothing to the copied files (maybe report an
> message to the user would be nice). I imagined it to work the same way
> as if you would by hand replace each symlink with the literal file and
> then when you unstow, stow notices that it doesn't belong to any
> package and skips that file. I think that this is the current
> behaviour of stow right now when it sees an literal file. The less
> stow tries to guess for the user the better IMHO.
Agreed. In that case, this seems doable too. How do you see DEST ? I guess
as relative to the target directory ?
--
Gaël Roualland -+- address@hidden