[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Bug-tar] gtar --listed-incremental silently failing again
From: |
MrC |
Subject: |
RE: [Bug-tar] gtar --listed-incremental silently failing again |
Date: |
Mon, 21 May 2007 10:03:13 -0700 |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: MrC
> Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 1:13 PM
> Cc: 'Sergey Poznyakoff'; 'Dat Head'
> Subject: RE: [Bug-tar] gtar --listed-incremental silently
> failing again
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Sergey Poznyakoff
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 4:37 AM
> > To: Dat Head
> > Subject: Re: [Bug-tar] gtar --listed-incremental silently failing
> > again
> >
> > Dat Head ha escrit:
> >
> > > /usr/local/bin/gtar --version
> > > tar (GNU tar) 1.15.92
> >
> > MrC ha escrit:
> >
> > > I'm seeing an issue with tar 1.16 (plus patch indicated
> below) where
> >
> > Please try the CVS version, or at least the latest stable, which is
> > 1.16.1. There were several incremental-related fixes recently.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Sergey
>
> Thanks for the response Sergey. Unfortunately, today's CVS
> does not resolve the problem. Incremental is still randomly
> either performing essentially a full archive, or nothing at
> all. I can't determine what triggers the randomness, but it
> seems to be related to prior incremental runs, which store
> their archives in peer subdirectories (eg. dir/backupA,
> dir/backupB, ... dir/backupC). If I do an incremental backup
> on only dir/backupC repeatedly, incremental seems to work.
> If I run all backups, dir/backupC will then perform a full
> backup, despite previously having just completed many
> individual incremental backups for dir/backupC.
>
> Any other ideas for debugging ?
>
> MrC
>
Sorry, don't mean to be a pest. Any help or progress on this issue with
listed-incremental ?
Thanks,
MrC