bug-tar
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-tar] [GNU tar 1.18] testsuite: 6 failed


From: Jan-Benedict Glaw
Subject: Re: [Bug-tar] [GNU tar 1.18] testsuite: 6 failed
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 20:13:14 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)

On Sat, 2007-06-30 11:48:15 -0600, Eric Blake <address@hidden> wrote:
> According to Sergey Poznyakoff on 6/30/2007 2:08 AM:
> > (- mark expected lines, + marks the obtained ones). In this case, the
> > expected lines are completely wrong. The command used to produce them
> > is (see testsuite:2257):
> > 
> > echo "jeden\\ndwa
> > trzy
> > "
> 
> Using echo with \ is inherently non-portable, because of the difference in
> whether echo interprets backslash sequences without options, vs. whether
> echo even accepts options.  The testsuite has a bug, in that it should be
> determining whether echo supports backslashes by default, and if not, fall
> back on something that does (echo -e, or printf).

printf is ment to be portable.  However, some of the testsuite
failures seem to be caused by `genfile' being not in $PATH or it was
not built at all...

MfG, JBG

-- 
      Jan-Benedict Glaw      address@hidden              +49-172-7608481
Signature of:               The real problem with C++ for kernel modules is:
the second  :                                 the language just sucks.
                                                   -- Linus Torvalds

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]