[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ODP: [Bug-tar] LZO and LZMA compression
From: |
Joerg Schilling |
Subject: |
Re: ODP: [Bug-tar] LZO and LZMA compression |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Oct 2007 22:17:07 +0200 |
User-agent: |
nail 11.22 3/20/05 |
"Jan Psota" <address@hidden> wrote:
> > That's difficult to do, since a two-letter short option violates POSIX
> > recommendations. -7z should be equivalent to -7 -z should be equivalent
> > to -z -7, but we already have -z.
> All the truth.
This is not true:
- POSIX does not forbid long options, it only recommends to use short
options.
- tar is not POSIX but SUSv2 and a tar implementation that "supports"
-z -7 violates SUSv2
The only conforming way to implement tar is _not_ to implement options
in tar. "tar cf7 /dev/rmt/0 ." is conforming, "tar -cf7 /dev/rmt/0 ."
is not.
For this reason, it is not possible to get into trouble with -7z, in special
as it is a _long_ option.
Jörg
--
EMail:address@hidden (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
address@hidden (uni)
address@hidden (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
- [Bug-tar] LZO and LZMA compression, Jan Psota, 2007/10/12
- Re: [Bug-tar] LZO and LZMA compression, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2007/10/12
- Re: [Bug-tar] LZO and LZMA compression, Joerg Schilling, 2007/10/17
- Re: [Bug-tar] LZO and LZMA compression, Eric Blake, 2007/10/17
- ODP: [Bug-tar] LZO and LZMA compression, Jan Psota, 2007/10/17
- Re: ODP: [Bug-tar] LZO and LZMA compression,
Joerg Schilling <=
- Re: ODP: [Bug-tar] LZO and LZMA compression, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2007/10/17
- Re: ODP: [Bug-tar] LZO and LZMA compression, Joerg Schilling, 2007/10/17
- Re: ODP: [Bug-tar] LZO and LZMA compression, Paul Eggert, 2007/10/22
- ODP: [Bug-tar] LZO and LZMA compression, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2007/10/17
Re: [Bug-tar] LZO and LZMA compression, Joerg Schilling, 2007/10/17