[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug-tar] (no subject)
From: |
Pierre Forget |
Subject: |
[Bug-tar] (no subject) |
Date: |
Wed, 22 Oct 2008 21:24:44 -0400 |
Hi,
I seem to have a specific bug in Tar. On a Linux (Slackware 10 with kernel
2.4.32) server I use the following command to backup the main partition
(root partition), with the Tar version 1.14:
tar -czpPlf /backup/backup-root.0.tgz --directory / --ignore-failed-read
--exclude=backup --exclude=mnt --exclude=proc --exclude=sda3-dev
--exclude=sdb1-dev --exclude=sdc1-dev .
This saves all the files, excpet the one's which could have been modified
on the fly, which I can live with. If I do a restore or check the files in
the Tar archive with tar -tf|less, I can see that I have all my important
files.
On another server (Slackware 12 with kernel 2.6.23.1) I use the similar
command (except for one partition exclusion) with Tar version 1.16.1:
tar -czpPlf /backup/backup-root.0.tgz --directory / --ignore-failed-read
--exclude=backup --exclude=mnt --exclude=proc --exclude=sda3-dev
--exclude=sdb1-dev .
The main major problem is that some important directories are not in the
backup archive, such as the ETC, BOOT, LIB, BIN.
So, when I do a restore, the system cannot start. Unless I have a stupid
typo, but I looked more than once before calling a bug.
I understand that I can switch to the latest version 1.20 (which I will do
to make a check), but that may fool many people like me who are using the
older version without checking with a restore. Unless some switches have
changed, but I doubt those switches are obsolete.
Thank you,
Pierre Forget
Service Informatique Pierre Forget Inc
Web design and hosting
Network services
Webmaster for/pour www.st-donat.com
address@hidden
Spam detection software, running on the system "coldfoot.st-donat.com", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
address@hidden for details.
Content preview: Hi, I seem to have a specific bug in Tar. On a Linux
(Slackware 10 with kernel 2.4.32) server I use the following command to
backup the main partition (root partition), with the Tar version 1.14:
tar -czpPlf /backup/backup-root.0.tgz --directory / --ignore-failed-read
--exclude=backup --exclude=mnt --exclude=proc --exclude=sda3-dev
--exclude=sdb1-dev --exclude=sdc1-dev . [...]
Content analysis details: (4.8 points, 4.5 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO Received: contains a forged HELO
1.4 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail)
[SPF failed: Please see
http://www.openspf.org/why.html?sender=pierre.forget%40st-donat.com&ip=24.122.245.237&receiver=coldfoot.st-donat.com]
0.0 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60%
[score: 0.4123]
1.5 DNS_FROM_SECURITYSAGE RBL: Envelope sender in
blackholes.securitysage.com
1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [Bug-tar] (no subject),
Pierre Forget <=