bug-tar
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Bug-tar] Performance difference between 1.15.1 and 1.20


From: Jaco van der Schyff
Subject: [Bug-tar] Performance difference between 1.15.1 and 1.20
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 08:43:58 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09)

I upgraded tar on two linux servers that I use for backup and restore.

My dataset is 2.2 TB and I noticed the following (significant)
difference

tar-1.15-1:

Backup:  36.373 hours @ 16.5 MB/hour
Restore: 57.067 hours @ 10.5 MB/hour

tar-1.20:

Backup:   37.88 hours @ 16.0 MB/hour
Restore: 142.98 hours @  4.2 MB/hour


The backup times are close enough, my problem is with the restore
time; an increase of 250%.  The only thing changed on my system
was the version of tar.

If this is not a know issue, or a unique occurence in my case, I could
run 1.20 for backup and 1.15.1 for restore, but I don't really want to
have two differnt versions installed.

Am I missing something?


- Jaco van der Schyff




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]