[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-tar] Use posix_fadvise to improve archive creation performance
From: |
Ralph Corderoy |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-tar] Use posix_fadvise to improve archive creation performance |
Date: |
Thu, 30 Mar 2017 19:34:11 +0100 |
Hi Paul,
> > I think it would be a good idea to add an option to tell tar whether
> > to use POSIX_FADV_NOREUSE, POSIX_FADV_DONTNEED, or neither, since
> > there may be cases where any of the three possibilities is best.
>
> Might make sense, yes.
I often want to run tar, sha1sum, grep, etc., on a huge file knowing
that I won't do it again soon and I don't want it bullying the nice
working-set cache out the door. It seems crazy every command has to add
options to twiddle POSIX_FADV_NOREUSE, like dd(1)'s nocache [io]flag
IIRC. We have stdbuf(1). Perhaps a similar approach can be used to
affect command, even if it can't work in all cases.
fadvise --noreuse sha1sum big.foo
(Linux not implementing it aside. Perhaps wider use in userspace would
encourage implementation.)
--
Cheers, Ralph.
https://plus.google.com/+RalphCorderoy
- [Bug-tar] Use posix_fadvise to improve archive creation performance, Carlo Alberto Ferraris, 2017/03/27
- Re: [Bug-tar] Use posix_fadvise to improve archive creation performance, Paul Eggert, 2017/03/28
- Re: [Bug-tar] Use posix_fadvise to improve archive creation performance, Carlo Alberto Ferraris, 2017/03/29
- Re: [Bug-tar] Use posix_fadvise to improve archive creation performance, Paul Eggert, 2017/03/30
- Re: [Bug-tar] Use posix_fadvise to improve archive creation performance, Mark, 2017/03/30
- Re: [Bug-tar] Use posix_fadvise to improve archive creation performance, Paul Eggert, 2017/03/30
- Re: [Bug-tar] Use posix_fadvise to improve archive creation performance,
Ralph Corderoy <=
- Re: [Bug-tar] Use posix_fadvise to improve archive creation performance, Uwe Menges, 2017/03/30
- Re: [Bug-tar] Use posix_fadvise to improve archive creation performance, Uwe, 2017/03/31