[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: @verbatiminclude inside @smallformat
From: |
Stepan Kasal |
Subject: |
Re: @verbatiminclude inside @smallformat |
Date: |
Fri, 1 Jul 2005 08:24:52 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.1i |
Hello,
On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 05:20:45PM -0400, Karl Berry wrote:
>
> "defines \nonarrowing to inhibit narrowing at next level down."
> My knowledge of English betrays me here. "next level down" means
> "the next level", or "all levels below?"
>
> Well, the text as written would mean "the next level", but I'm not sure
> the comment was written with such a precise meaning in mind.
Implemented and committed, patch attached to this mail.
> I guess I can imagine @cartouche being used like this, though I'm not
> sure it ever has been in actual practice:
>
> @cartouche
> Here is some descriptive text we've boxed off in a display.
>
> @example
> x = y + z; # some code inside the display
> @end example
>
> Some more text after the code.
>
> @end cartouche
>
> In this case, the embedded example should presumably be indented
> relative to the descriptive text.
It's arguable. If the surrounding text is short, it might be better to
have the example without any indentation.
> Can you try it out? (I hate @cartouche. :)
No. Let's wait for a bug report. ;-)
Have a nice day,
Stepan
texinfo-20050701-nonarrowing.patch
Description: Text document
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: @verbatiminclude inside @smallformat,
Stepan Kasal <=