[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
use <a> for hancors without content, not <span>
From: |
Patrice Dumas |
Subject: |
use <a> for hancors without content, not <span> |
Date: |
Sun, 26 Dec 2021 18:33:15 +0100 |
Hello,
Currently <span id="id"></span> is used for anchors, whether they
originate from @anchor, in some cases from @node and sectionning
@-commands, @*index, ... It is syntactically correct, but I think that
it would be semantically better to use <a> and keep <span> for inline
text that needs some kind of formatting information.
Also I propose to add class to the anchors to distinguish their source.
Any opposition/idea?
--
Pat
- use <a> for hancors without content, not <span>,
Patrice Dumas <=
- Re: use <a> for hancors without content, not <span>, Per Bothner, 2021/12/26
- Re: use <a> for hancors without content, not <span>, Patrice Dumas, 2021/12/26
- Re: use <a> for hancors without content, not <span>, Per Bothner, 2021/12/26
- Re: use <a> for hancors without content, not <span>, Gavin Smith, 2021/12/26
- Re: use <a> for hancors without content, not <span>, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2021/12/26
- Re: use <a> for hancors without content, not <span>, Patrice Dumas, 2021/12/26
- Re: use <a> for hancors without content, not <span>, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2021/12/26
Re: use <a> for hancors without content, not <span>, Patrice Dumas, 2021/12/26